Imagine this.

An underwriting team receives 250 submission emails a day.
Each email includes 10 or more attachments — applications, ACORDs, loss runs, schedules, statements.

That’s 2,500 documents someone has to open, read, cross-check, and retype just to determine whether a risk is worth quoting.

This isn’t underwriting.
It’s manual document preparation disguised as underwriting.

Where time actually goes

In high-volume lines like commercial property, submission intake often consumes more time than risk evaluation itself. Before judgment can even begin, teams are forced to:

• Open and review dozens of documents per submission
• Extract key values manually
• Reconcile inconsistencies across forms
• Fill in missing information just to create a usable file

The work is necessary — but it’s not where underwriting expertise adds the most value.

Shifting submission intake into a workflow

At FurtherAI, submission intake is treated as a workflow, not an inbox problem.

A submission can be triggered simply by forwarding an email to a dedicated inbox or uploading files directly into the workspace. From there, the system:

• Extracts relevant values across documents
• Identifies gaps and inconsistencies
• Validates key details
• Assembles a clean, underwriter-ready package

All of this happens before the underwriter ever opens the file.

What this changes for teams

By handling the mechanical work upstream, underwriters can shift their time toward evaluation rather than reconstruction. The impact shows up across the workflow:

• Brokers receive faster, more consistent responses
• Underwriters focus on the right risks instead of document prep
• Teams spend less time buried in ACORDs and loss runs

The goal isn’t to accelerate decisions blindly — it’s to ensure that when a decision is made, it’s based on a complete, structured view of the risk.

Seeing the workflow in practice

In the video accompanying this post, Nia Casso, our Founding Account Executive, walks through how this workflow operates for commercial property submissions inside the FurtherAI workspace.

It’s a practical look at how submission intake can move from email chaos to a structured, reviewable process — without changing how brokers submit or how underwriters make decisions.

Reclaiming underwriting time

Submission volume isn’t slowing down. But the amount of manual effort required to process those submissions doesn’t have to scale with it.

By removing repetitive document work from the front of the workflow, underwriting teams can spend more time doing what they’re actually trained to do: assess risk, apply judgment, and make informed decisions.

That’s the difference between processing submissions and practicing underwriting.

‍